Tuesday, February 17, 2009

New World Order May Be Islamicist

It amazes me how people often know so little about the world in which they live. That is not to say that what I think I know about it is always correct. I've learned sometimes that I was wrong.

But when someone, even someone young, asks this sort of question, it terrifies me to think that it is the reason we have headed so far down the paths of nationalism and socialism. Someone asked:

"Did American (USA) society just come to be or was its creation...a conspiracy (but either good or bad- i don't know what word to use). What I'm trying to ask is, was it planned? Who's trying to control us!? Some kind of secret order?"

We all wonder about "control." We hear stories, about how J. Edgar Hoover had the "dirt" on everyone who was someone and used it to control them. We all have heard about the New World Order and if we believe in it, each of us has our theory of what it means and who's behind it. First we thought it was Ronald Reagan, but even Bill Clinton was caught up in it according to some accounts.

If there is a "new world order," it isn't what we though it was twenty years ago. It now seems as if this new order is western governments caving in to Muslim Sharia. It isn't the Islam in this order that scares me; it's the Sharia.

Britain has been caving for years, its courts allowing limited Sharia to operate in the UK. There is a least one member of the House of the Lords who is not only Muslim, (again, no problem so far as I care,) but he is also an Islamicist, and if Britania isn't careful, it will fall like Lebanon, except there won't be any war to accomplish it. Britain will go quietly into the night, and it is already turning off the lights on its own heritage dating from before the Magna Charta, heritage that finds freedom for the people where it was only the light at the end of the tunnel.

Now it has tunnel-vision, and the light of Western freedom is retreating.

But the answer to the opening question goes something like this:

The truth? No one is trying to control us but the politicians, and what they do is transparent enough if you read the laws they pass.You were born with individual sovereignty, said the founders.

"Individual sovereignty was not a peculiar conceit of Thomas Jefferson: It was the common assumption of the day; " http://www.friesian.com/ellis.htm

Another word for this type of sovereignty is "unalienable rights." THAT was the "conspiracy" that constructed our way of life. Unfortunately, the Founders didn't see the future coming, and left so many holes in the Constitution that it is basically worthless today.

But you can get back some of your sovereignty by supporting your states in their effort to force to the Fed govt to respect the 10th Amendment. The Tenth Amendment Newly Ascending

It won't be easy to regain your personal, individual, unalienable sovereignty, but it can be done because the 10th Amendment does exist, and it cannot be ignored--except by efforts such as the Patriot Act that declare the safety of the nation to be more important than its own laws which protect its own citizens.

In Britain, it may be harder. There is no hard, written Constitution except precedent, which, under the right leadership, may be able to pull England out of the clutches of the clerics who are Islamicists. Lord Ahmed is a repugnant individual in association, character and morality who has threatened jihad on the House of Lords. "The Pakistani Press is jubliant, and [ ] is praising Allah for delivering ‘a victory for the Muslim community’." Creeping Jihad at Harvard & VA; Your Town Next?

But don't think Sharia isn't coming to a U.S. location near you soon. Muzzammil Hassan, founder of Bridges TV, is charged with murder in the beheading of his wife, Aasiya Hassan in Orchard Park, New York. http://www.buffalonews.com/437/story/578644.html

"A cautionary tale is unfolding in the Netherlands this week about how dangerous those can be: proving that such tools in the hands of the powerful enable them to silence the powerless and crush dissent, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal ordered that Geert Wilders, a member of the Dutch Parliament and maker of the notorious film "Fitna", be prosecuted for 'incitement to hatred and discrimination based on his statements in various media about moslims [sic] and their belief. In addition, the Court of Appeal considers criminal prosecution obvious for the insult of Islamic worshippers because of the comparisons made by Wilders of the Islam [sic] with the nazism.'

"The action against Wilders is taking place against the backdrop of the 57-government Organization of the Islamic Conference’s efforts at the United Nations to silence speech that they deem critical of Islam -- including 'defamation of Islam' that goes under the 'pretext' of 'freedom of expression, counter terrorism or national security.'

"If they succeed in doing this, Europeans and Americans will be rendered mute, and thus defenseless, in the face of the advancing jihad and attempt to impose Sharia on the West -- in fact, one of the key elements of the laws for dhimmis, non-Muslims subjugated under Islamic rule, is that they are never critical of Islam, Muhammad, or the Qur’an. Thus this initiative not only aids the advance of Sharia in the West, but is itself an element of that advance." Jailed for an Insult?

"It will be interesting to see how much attention the news media pays to this story. It will be even more revealing to see if anyone in the media investigates why [Hassan] chose beheading as a means to murder his wife. Will the media look into what the Qur’an and Hadith say about beheading enemies? Will the media look into the relationship between honor killings, beheadings, and shariah law? Will the media investigate this man’s background, and how he worked to raise money in Saudi Arabia for his television station?

"Or will political correctness trump investigative journalism?" http://www.actforamerica.org/

The New World Order under Islamicism does not believe in individual sovereignty as defined by the 10 Amendment and Western laws that protect wives from being the property of their husbands, and who can be beheaded on the whim of a religious idea.

The Free Assemblage of Metaphysical Naturalists is the SM of
The Free Assemblage of Metaphysical Naturalists LLC.
The Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism TM
The Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism Blogger ©,
Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism Blogger Extra ©, and
The Metaphysical Naturalist ©,
are the educational arms of the LLC and are:
© 2008-2009 by Curtis Edward Clark and Naturalist Academy Publishing ®

blog comments powered by Disqus